In fact I'm struggling to believe any reasons it could be fake as there's limited evidence. the evidence for me leans me way more towards real. My point was, if it's a question of Fake or Real and you get a bullet to the head if you're wrong. However I wouldn't go as far as going "It's unquestionably real" A dude that is smart enough to grab internal files would be smart enough to pull such an elaborate troll. So I think that the same way R* did for GTA VI, so don't judge this pre-alpha build so soon. No way, GTA VI look worse than RDR2, can not imagine how, lol! We can never say this is 100% GTA VI cause we've got no official footage or screens of GTA VI, but given what we do know of GTA VI, what we do know of the footge we're seeing, it's then a case of the simplest answer is the correct answer, which is that it can only be GTA VI. So now the question is could someone fake that? Could someone go through that effort to make that map, the models, the animations? Sure, they could, I suppose, but it'd in all likelihood require a team and then the whole idea of this being a fake becomes silly because what team of developers (game dev, asset devs, animation, sound) are gonna spend their time making a fake of this magintude as opposed to. Then we have the debug stuff that is very reminiscent of what we know the debug stuff in prior R* games looks like. These are bespoke assets as far as anyone can tell. So we have a map, assets, character models, animations in the footage, right? Do any of those assets look like they were pulled from another game? Are they easy available store assets? The answer to that question, despite these leaks being widely viewed by the GTA and wider gaming community, is no. The question you should always ask when video/screens of a game leak is "if it's not X, what is it?". How are you sure that this is real and not a fake? I don't know anything about programming, I am barely able to plug in my monitors into my computer without setting them on fire and thats why I am looking for a simple explanation. but i guess the game will be worth it no matter what Thats why i didnt hope for a modern day vice city. the "feeling/setting"(call it what you want to call it) is very close to what we already have with gta5/online. The first thoughts i had when i watched the leaks for the very first time, i was like "ok cool. Don't care what anyone says.Īre you disappointed too? I don't understand why everyone is happy, it's the same part 5. Same with move from GTA IIII to Vice City.Īgain, this looks like GTAO+ Same cars, same looking stores, streets and enironments. There was nice variety in terms of games and colour palette. Partly it was about going from the sunny west and desert to east coast with mostly overcast and very different type of older city. The leap from Las Venturas/SanFierro/ to GTA IV's Liberty City looked insanely different. I'm talking about modern day setting in a place where it's most likely going to be mostly sunny all the time and parts of it will look just like GTA V. I'm not saying GTA VI wont look graphically beautiful. But this looks samey like some GTAO expansion. A different time setting would deliver us a very different looking GTA. It's looks like the same game we've been playing for the last 10 years, I personally don't have much hope for GTA VI. It being unfinished aside, this leak has confirmed my worries about going from a modern day GTA set in sunny LS to a modern day GTA in sunny VC.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |